Construction Law
Alliance Contracts
Expert Determination
Security of Payment
Sports Legal
Not For Profit
Case Reports
News Articles
Latest Documents
Cat Protection Society v Arvio [2018] VSC 757
Ian Street Developer v Arrow International [2018] VSCA 294
Alphington Developments Pty Ltd v Amcor Limited (No 3) [2018] VSC 54
Australian Pork Limited v Commissioner for ACT Revenue (Administrative Review) [2018] ACAT 85
Broken Hill City Council v Unique Urban Built Pty Ltd [2018] NSWSC 825
Vanguard Development Group Pty Ltd v Promax Building Developments Pty Ltd & Anor [2018] VSC 386
Rules for Surviving No Damages for Delay – Navigant
Alston + Bird LLP – Construction Law Review
Bricker & Eckler LLP – Memorandum
RAI INDUSTRIAL FABRICATORS, LLC, et al., Plaintiffs, v. FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Defendants.
No Damage for Delay Clauses – ACS Lawyers
Exceptions to No Damages for Delay Clauses
Southern Cross Electrical Engineering v Steve Magill Earthmoving [2018] NSWSC 1027 (5 July 2018)
The Nuance Group (Australia) Pty Limited v Shape Australia Pty Limited [2018] VSC 362 (29 June 2018)
Raskin v Mediterranean Olives Estate Limited & Ors [2017] VSC 94 (8 March 2017)
Editor’s Note Trump v Hawaii
PHHH Investments No 2 Pty Ltd v United Commercial Projects Pty Ltd [2018] VSC 15 (31 January 2018)
Green Suburban Pty Ltd v Vita Built Pty Ltd [2018] VSC 330 (28 June 2018)
Supreme Court of the United States – October 2017
United States of America v Russian Defendants
Sports Legal
Sports Legal
WADA v Bellchambers & Ors CAS 2015/A/4059
WADA v Bellchambers & Ors CAS 2015/A/4059
Is there an Out for Sharapova? TBC….
Middleton J Dismisses the Applications
Essendon FC v ASADA : James Hird v ASADA
Dr Bruce Malcolm Reid v Australian Football League
Liao Hui v. International Weightlifting Federation (IWF)
XZTT and Anti-Doping Rule Violation Panel [2012] AATA 728 (23 October 2012)
Australian Football League & ESP Merchandise Pty Ltd v Hard On Sport Pty Ltd & David Sumiga
Kutrovsky v. International Tennis Federation
Judge Sparks Denies Lance an Injunction, but leaves door open
Lance responds again to USADA’s jurisdiction arguments before the 10 August Hearing
Lance (and UCI) further argues the USADA Jurisdiction
Lance: The Arguments
The legal arguments Lance v USADA
Lance Armstrong: The next of the non-analytical positive cases?
Frank Schleck tests positive – another contaminated supplement case?
Lance’s Action Headed for Federal Court Determination
Lance Re-files in Federal Court
UCI v Alex Rasmussen & Denmark NOC &SF
UCI v Alex Rasmussen & Denmark NOC &SF
Armstrong’s lawyers get 20 days to amend the Complaint
Lance Armstrong: The next of the non-analytical positive cases?
CAS decides on 2 year ban for Contador
Cielo & ors v CBDA (the Brazilian National Swimming Federation)
Cielo & ors v CBDA (the Brazilian National Swimming Federation)
Wen Tong v. International Judo Federation
Oliviera v USADA
WADA & FIFA v. Cyprus Football Association (CFA), Carlos Marques & ors
WADA & FIFA v. Cyprus Football Association (CFA), Carlos Marques & ors
~tt
